EDCI 335

Link: https://minyuanyee335.opened.ca/post-1/

I think this blog is written very clearly. The introduction to the three major learning theories is concise and on point, and the structure is well-organized. I especially resonate with how you described your experience of understanding constructivism, using analogies, diagrams, and examples to break down abstract concepts—that really struck a chord with me. The content doesn’t feel thin at all, and the part about your personal learning process gave me a sense of your thought process. However, I personally feel that the connections between the three theories could be explored a bit more deeply, like how they complement or conflict with each other in real teaching scenarios, which might make it more insightful. Also, while your reflection on learning constructivism is solid, I think adding some specific details—like a particular challenge or a moment of realization—could make it even more impactful for me. I’d suggest trying to include a practical teaching example next time to show how the theories play out in practice, and maybe fleshing out your personal experience a bit more. That could make the article even more engaging.

After watching the YouTube video on “The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Daily Life,” I believe that students can engage in a group discussion activity to consolidate their understanding of the video content and expand their thinking. The activity could involve each student sharing examples of AI applications they encounter in their daily lives, such as smart assistants, self-driving cars, or personalized recommendation systems. Then, the group members can discuss how these technologies are changing their lifestyles. This activity helps students develop critical thinking and collaboration skills, while enhancing their practical knowledge and understanding of AI technology. Students can participate in the group discussion using their phones or computers and communicate online through platforms like Google Meet or Zoom to share their thoughts and perspectives.

The video encourages interaction with learners primarily through questioning and prompting reflection. For example, it poses questions like “How do you think AI will impact future jobs?” or “What privacy issues might arise with the popularity of smart homes?” These questions guide learners to reflect on the pros and cons of AI technologies and their future potential. Through such interaction, learners can not only deepen their understanding of the video content but also stimulate deeper thinking about AI ethics, societal impact, and other related issues.

To make the video more engaging and encourage more learner participation, interactive elements can be added during its design. For example, small surveys or quizzes could be inserted halfway through the video, allowing learners to answer questions in real time, or a small task could be provided at the end of the video to encourage learners to think of and propose their own AI application ideas. These interactions can help keep learners focused and make them more actively engaged in thinking about and applying the content of the video.

After watching the video, learners may take notes, especially when specific AI applications are discussed. They may also be prompted to think about how these technologies could influence their careers or lifestyles in the future. To deepen their understanding, students may search for related articles or videos to expand their knowledge on the topic. In this way, students are not just passively receiving information, but actively participating in the exploration of the subject.

Blog Prompt: What concept did you find difficult to understand? How did you approach learning the concept? What is one idea from the readings or videos that you disagree with, and why?

Although the theories of behaviorism and cognitivism are relatively straightforward, constructivism has left me feeling a bit puzzled. This theory emphasizes that learning is an active process of constructing knowledge, closely tied to each learner’s background and social environment. This focus on “personal experience” made it difficult for me to grasp its core concepts at first. To better understand it, I started focusing on finding practical applications of constructivism, such as problem-based learning and training through simulation activities. By observing these real-life examples, I realized that constructivism is not entirely without structure but rather provides a framework that encourages learners to actively participate, explore, and reflect. A key point of this learning model is that students’ understanding is not directly imparted by teachers but is constructed through interaction and hands-on practice.

However, I have some reservations about one argument in the article. The author claims that constructivism may be the best choice for solving complex problems because it allows for personalized learning and enables learners to fully exercise their initiative. Yet, I believe this theory might not always be applicable in practice. If students lack sufficient foundational knowledge or self-management skills, they could easily lose their way in a classroom entirely based on constructivism. In such cases, I feel that structured teaching might be more effective.

This post  will appear in a few places:

1. in the blog feed on the front of your website
2. in the Learning Design menu on your website. This is because we have applied the “edci335” category to this post and the menu item “Learning Design” has been created from the category “edci335.” For every post you make for this course, please assign the “edci335” category to it. You are welcome to use this blog for your personal hobbies or for other courses, in which case, you could create additional menu items and categories for them.
3. if you give permission, your posts categorized “edci335” will be aggregated onto the Blog Feed on the EDCI 335 Course Website.

Feel free to delete this post once you understand this. If you have any questions, please reach out to your instructor.